FNDF vs RWL: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, FNDF and RWL overlap 1.5% by weight. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF): Developed ex-U.S. large stocks. Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL): Large-cap revenue-weight index.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do FNDF and RWL overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, FNDF and RWL overlap 1.5% by weight.

3% of FNDF is already inside RWL.

5% of RWL is already inside FNDF.

FNDF holds 863 companies and RWL holds 501; 26 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FNDF and RWL?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDF 5.8 out of 10 and RWL 4.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: FNDF 7.3 and RWL 1.5.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FNDF vs RWL — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorFNDFRWL
Growth7.31.5
Valuation3.11.6
Risk7.16.1
Quality1.84.4
Return7.87.8

FNDF is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year

As of September 11, 2026, FNDF charges 0.25% a year, yields 3.35% and holds $26.5B in assets across 863 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, RWL charges 0.39% a year, yields 1.74% and holds $10.0B in assets across 501 positions.

FNDF vs RWL — cost, income and size
MeasureFNDFRWL
Expense ratio0.25%0.39%
Dividend yield3.35%1.74%
Assets under management$26.5B$10.0B
Holdings863501

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where FNDF and RWL trade against their own history

FNDF trades at 14.8 times earnings, against its own median of 11.7, and is more expensive than 92% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

RWL trades at 20.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.1, and is more expensive than 89% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved FNDF and RWL this week

FNDF fell 0.6% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Novartis (−15.2%), BHP (−4.7%) and Sony (−5.2%); Samsung Electronics (+4.9%) pushed the other way.

RWL fell 1.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were UnitedHealth (−5.4%), McKesson (−4.3%) and Cencora (−4.6%); Dell Technologies (+10.2%) pushed the other way.

What do FNDF and RWL each hold?

What's inside FNDF: Tech 13%, Memory 6%.

16% of FNDF is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside RWL: Tech 17%, Magnificent 7 13%.

23% of RWL is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FNDF vs RWL holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndf-vs-rwl

  1. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF)
  2. Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL)

Register free to unlock FNDF vs RWL prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →