FNDF vs PRF: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, FNDF and PRF overlap 1.4% by weight. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF): Developed ex-U.S. large stocks. Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF): U.S. equities by fundamental size.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do FNDF and PRF overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, FNDF and PRF overlap 1.4% by weight.

4% of FNDF is already inside PRF.

4% of PRF is already inside FNDF.

FNDF holds 863 companies and PRF holds 995; 37 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FNDF and PRF?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FNDF 5.8 out of 10 and PRF 4.5 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: FNDF 7.3 and PRF 1.9.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FNDF vs PRF — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorFNDFPRF
Growth7.31.9
Valuation3.11.4
Risk7.15.3
Quality1.85.4
Return7.87.9

FNDF is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year

As of September 11, 2026, FNDF charges 0.25% a year, yields 3.35% and holds $26.5B in assets across 863 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, PRF charges 0.34% a year, yields 1.86% and holds $10.1B in assets across 995 positions.

FNDF vs PRF — cost, income and size
MeasureFNDFPRF
Expense ratio0.25%0.34%
Dividend yield3.35%1.86%
Assets under management$26.5B$10.1B
Holdings863995

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where FNDF and PRF trade against their own history

FNDF trades at 14.8 times earnings, against its own median of 11.7, and is more expensive than 92% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

PRF trades at 19.9 times earnings, against its own median of 16.8, and is more expensive than 89% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved FNDF and PRF this week

FNDF fell 0.6% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Novartis (−15.2%), BHP (−4.7%) and Sony (−5.2%); Samsung Electronics (+4.9%) pushed the other way.

PRF fell 1.0% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (−2.8%), UnitedHealth (−5.4%) and Amgen (−15.0%); Intel (+12.3%) pushed the other way.

What do FNDF and PRF each hold?

What's inside FNDF: Tech 13%, Memory 6%.

16% of FNDF is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside PRF: Tech 26%, Magnificent 7 15%.

23% of PRF is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FNDF vs PRF holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/fndf-vs-prf

  1. Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF)
  2. Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF)

Register free to unlock FNDF vs PRF prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →