FLQM vs IWB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, FLQM and IWB overlap 4.9% by weight. Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM): U.S. mid-cap stocks. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB): Russell 1000 index.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do FLQM and IWB overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, FLQM and IWB overlap 4.9% by weight.

100% of FLQM is already inside IWB.

5% of IWB is already inside FLQM.

FLQM holds 204 companies and IWB holds 1,020; 203 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score FLQM and IWB?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores FLQM 4.8 out of 10 and IWB 5.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Valuation: FLQM 8.7 and IWB 2.8.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

FLQM vs IWB — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	FLQM	IWB
Growth	1.7	3.2
Valuation	8.7	2.8
Risk	7.3	4.9
Quality	6.5	8.2
Return	2.4	7.4

IWB is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of September 11, 2026, FLQM charges 0.30% a year, yields 1.86% and holds $1.5B in assets across 204 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, IWB charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.10% and holds $49.4B in assets across 1020 positions.

FLQM vs IWB — cost, income and size
Measure	FLQM	IWB
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.15%
Dividend yield	1.86%	1.10%
Assets under management	$1.5B	$49.4B
Holdings	204	1020

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where FLQM and IWB trade against their own history

FLQM trades at 16.8 times earnings, against its own median of 18.0, and is cheaper than 72% of its own 112 monthly readings since 2017.

IWB trades at 25.0 times earnings, against its own median of 21.3, and is more expensive than 83% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved FLQM and IWB this week

FLQM fell 2.5% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Expedia (−7.4%), Autodesk (−10.6%) and Paychex (−7.4%); HP (+11.1%) pushed the other way.

IWB fell 1.2% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Nvidia (−4.4%), Microsoft (−2.8%) and Eli Lilly (−3.8%); Advanced Micro Devices (+13.1%) pushed the other way.

What do FLQM and IWB each hold?

What's inside FLQM: Tech 13%, Semiconductors 1%.

11% of FLQM is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside IWB: Tech 44%, Magnificent 7 31%.

35% of IWB is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “FLQM vs IWB holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/flqm-vs-iwb