ETF Copilot

EWH vs KWEB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 28, 2026, EWH and KWEB overlap 0.0% by weight. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH): Hong Kong equities. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB): China-based internet companies listed overseas.

Updated October 28, 2026

Where EWH and KWEB trade against their own history

EWH trades at 12.5 times earnings, against its own median of 15.1, and is cheaper than 90% of its own last 9 years.

KWEB trades at 11.9 times earnings, against its own median of 20.2, and is cheaper than 99% of its own last 9 years.

What moved EWH and KWEB this week

EWH fell 0.8% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were AIA (−1.6%), Hong Kong Exchanges & CLE (−2.1%) and BOC Hong Kong (−3.9%); Link (+2.9%) pushed the other way.

KWEB fell 3.2% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Netease (−9.4%), Alibaba (−4.6%) and Lenovo (−8.5%); Knowledge Atlas Technology JSC (+15.3%) pushed the other way.

What do EWH and KWEB each hold?

70% of EWH is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside KWEB: Tech 26%, Memory 2%.

61% of KWEB is its ten largest holdings.

How much do EWH and KWEB overlap? 0.0% by weight

As of October 28, 2026, EWH and KWEB overlap 0.0% by weight.

0% of EWH is already inside KWEB.

0% of KWEB is already inside EWH.

EWH holds 30 companies and KWEB holds 45; 0 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score EWH and KWEB? 3.0 and 3.6 out of 10

As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores EWH 3.0 out of 10 and KWEB 3.6 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: EWH 0.2 and KWEB 7.0.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

EWH vs KWEB — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorEWHKWEB
Growth0.27.0
Value8.49.8
Risk2.10.4
Quality5.61.0
Return1.20.1

EWH is the cheaper of the two at 0.50% a year

As of October 28, 2026, EWH charges 0.50% a year, yields 4.70% and holds $1.2B in assets across 30 positions.

As of October 28, 2026, KWEB charges 0.69% a year, yields 9.13% and holds $4.3B in assets across 45 positions.

EWH vs KWEB — cost, income and size
MeasureEWHKWEB
Expense ratio0.50%0.69%
Dividend yield4.70%9.13%
Assets under management$1.2B$4.3B
Holdings3045

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “EWH vs KWEB holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/ewh-vs-kweb

  1. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH)
  2. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks EWH vs KWEB prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →