EFAV vs XMHQ: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, EFAV and XMHQ overlap 0.9% by weight. iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV): Developed market equities. Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ): High-quality mid-cap stocks.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do EFAV and XMHQ overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, EFAV and XMHQ overlap 0.9% by weight.

1% of EFAV is already inside XMHQ.

6% of XMHQ is already inside EFAV.

EFAV holds 278 companies and XMHQ holds 80; 4 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score EFAV and XMHQ?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores EFAV 5.0 out of 10 and XMHQ 3.9 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: EFAV 9.5 and XMHQ 3.4.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

EFAV vs XMHQ — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorEFAVXMHQ
Growth4.00.5
Valuation7.14.3
Risk9.53.4
Quality4.06.8
Return2.35.3

EFAV is the cheaper of the two at 0.20% a year

As of September 11, 2026, EFAV charges 0.20% a year, yields 3.44% and holds $5.5B in assets across 278 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, XMHQ charges 0.30% a year, yields 0.92% and holds $5.5B in assets across 80 positions.

EFAV vs XMHQ — cost, income and size
MeasureEFAVXMHQ
Expense ratio0.20%0.30%
Dividend yield3.44%0.92%
Assets under management$5.5B$5.5B
Holdings27880

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where EFAV and XMHQ trade against their own history

EFAV trades at 17.0 times earnings, against its own median of 15.9, and is more expensive than 65% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

XMHQ trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.0, and is more expensive than 74% of its own 88 monthly readings since 2019.

What moved EFAV and XMHQ this week

EFAV fell 1.2% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Novartis (−15.2%), Unilever (−3.8%) and Zurich Insurance (−3.3%); Softbank (+5.7%) pushed the other way.

XMHQ fell 3.1% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Illumina (−6.9%), Manhattan Associates (−9.2%) and Technipfmc (−4.7%); Nvent Electric (+6.8%) pushed the other way.

What do EFAV and XMHQ each hold?

What's inside EFAV: Tech 8%, AI 1%.

15% of EFAV is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside XMHQ: Tech 20%, Memory 2%.

32% of XMHQ is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “EFAV vs XMHQ holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/efav-vs-xmhq

  1. iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV)
  2. Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)

Register free to unlock EFAV vs XMHQ prices and holdings on ETF Copilot.

Register free →