ETF Copilot

EEM vs KURE: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 28, 2026, EEM and KURE overlap 1.2% by weight. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM): Emerging market equities. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE): Chinese healthcare companies.

Updated October 28, 2026

Where EEM and KURE trade against their own history

EEM trades at 13.3 times earnings, against its own median of 13.4, and is cheaper than 54% of its own last 9 years.

KURE trades at 22.0 times earnings, against its own median of 24.0, and is cheaper than 75% of its own last 9 years.

What moved KURE this week

KURE fell 2.3% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Innovent Biologics (−8.8%), Beone Medicines (−4.9%) and Wuxi Biologics (−6.2%); Genscript Biotech (+7.0%) pushed the other way.

What do EEM and KURE each hold?

What's inside EEM: Tech 43%, Semiconductors 26%.

38% of EEM is its ten largest holdings.

54% of KURE is its ten largest holdings.

How much do EEM and KURE overlap? 1.2% by weight

As of October 28, 2026, EEM and KURE overlap 1.2% by weight.

1% of EEM is already inside KURE.

99% of KURE is already inside EEM.

EEM holds 1,188 companies and KURE holds 42; 41 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score EEM and KURE? 5.9 and 3.3 out of 10

As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores EEM 5.9 out of 10 and KURE 3.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: EEM 9.1 and KURE 2.6.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

EEM vs KURE — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorEEMKURE
Growth9.12.6
Value5.47.9
Risk3.20.5
Quality7.47.1
Return3.80.4

EEM is the cheaper of the two at 0.72% a year

As of October 28, 2026, EEM charges 0.72% a year, yields 1.76% and holds $28.8B in assets across 1188 positions.

As of October 28, 2026, KURE charges 0.79% a year, yields 4.02% and holds $107M in assets across 42 positions.

EEM vs KURE — cost, income and size
MeasureEEMKURE
Expense ratio0.72%0.79%
Dividend yield1.76%4.02%
Assets under management$28.8B$107M
Holdings118842

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “EEM vs KURE holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/eem-vs-kure

  1. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM)
  2. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks EEM vs KURE prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →