ECNS vs EEMS: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 28, 2026, ECNS and EEMS overlap 8.8% by weight. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS): Small-cap Chinese equities. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS): Owns a focused strategy.
Updated October 28, 2026
Where ECNS and EEMS trade against their own history
ECNS trades at 11.0 times earnings, against its own median of 9.1, and is more expensive than 72% of its own last 9 years.
EEMS trades at 14.9 times earnings, against its own median of 13.9, and is more expensive than 70% of its own last 9 years.
What moved ECNS and EEMS this week
ECNS fell 2.7% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Keymed Biosciences (−22.0%), Joyy (−10.8%) and ZAI LAB (−8.0%); Meitu (+6.4%) pushed the other way.
EEMS fell 2.4% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Sendas Distribuidora (−46.3%), Totvs (−25.6%) and Taiwan Union Technology (−8.2%); Samsung Engineering (+33.1%) pushed the other way.
What do ECNS and EEMS each hold?
What's inside ECNS: Tech 13%, Semiconductors 1%.
15% of ECNS is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside EEMS: Tech 25%, Semiconductors 10%.
5% of EEMS is its ten largest holdings.
How much do ECNS and EEMS overlap? 8.8% by weight
As of October 28, 2026, ECNS and EEMS overlap 8.8% by weight.
97% of ECNS is already inside EEMS.
9% of EEMS is already inside ECNS.
ECNS holds 233 companies and EEMS holds 1,690; 218 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score ECNS and EEMS? 1.6 and 3.5 out of 10
As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ECNS 1.6 out of 10 and EEMS 3.5 out of 10.
They differ most on Risk: ECNS 0.6 and EEMS 5.2.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | ECNS | EEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.8 | 5.7 |
| Value | 5.5 | 1.8 |
| Risk | 0.6 | 5.2 |
| Quality | 0.4 | 1.9 |
| Return | 0.3 | 2.2 |
ECNS is the cheaper of the two at 0.59% a year
As of October 28, 2026, ECNS charges 0.59% a year, yields 7.28% and holds $57M in assets across 233 positions.
As of October 28, 2026, EEMS charges 0.72% a year, yields 3.00% and holds $361M in assets across 1690 positions.
| Measure | ECNS | EEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.72% |
| Dividend yield | 7.28% | 3.00% |
| Assets under management | $57M | $361M |
| Holdings | 233 | 1690 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “ECNS vs EEMS holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/ecns-vs-eems
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ECNS vs EEMS prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →