ETF Copilot

DFAC vs LRNZ: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, DFAC and LRNZ overlap 10.1% by weight. Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC): U.S. broad market equities. TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ): US AI and deep learning companies.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where DFAC trades against its own history

DFAC trades at 21.5 times earnings, against its own median of 21.1, and is more expensive than 56% of its own 52 monthly readings since 2021.

What moved DFAC and LRNZ this week

DFAC rose 0.8% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Apple (+0.9%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

LRNZ fell 1.7% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Schrodinger Inc./united States (−10.0%), Vicor (−13.9%) and Arm (−13.4%); Snowflake (+8.2%) pushed the other way.

What do DFAC and LRNZ each hold?

What's inside DFAC: Tech 34%, Magnificent 7 24%.

28% of DFAC is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside LRNZ: Tech 76%, AI 39%.

54% of LRNZ is its ten largest holdings.

How much do DFAC and LRNZ overlap? 10.1% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, DFAC and LRNZ overlap 10.1% by weight.

12% of DFAC is already inside LRNZ.

92% of LRNZ is already inside DFAC.

DFAC holds 2,533 companies and LRNZ holds 26; 22 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score DFAC and LRNZ? 6.3 and 6.0 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores DFAC 6.3 out of 10 and LRNZ 6.0 out of 10.

They differ most on Risk: DFAC 7.1 and LRNZ 0.4.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

DFAC vs LRNZ — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorDFACLRNZ
Growth6.09.9
Value4.810.0
Risk7.10.4
Quality7.10.4
Return6.77.0

DFAC is the cheaper of the two at 0.21% a year

As of October 9, 2026, DFAC charges 0.21% a year, yields 0.88% and holds $49.1B in assets across 2533 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, LRNZ charges 0.68% a year and holds $44M in assets across 26 positions.

DFAC vs LRNZ — cost, income and size
MeasureDFACLRNZ
Expense ratio0.21%0.68%
Dividend yield0.88%—
Assets under management$49.1B$44M
Holdings253326

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “DFAC vs LRNZ holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/dfac-vs-lrnz

  1. Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC)
  2. TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks DFAC vs LRNZ prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →