ETF Copilot

CQQQ vs KWEB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 28, 2026, CQQQ and KWEB overlap 39.9% by weight. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ): Chinese technology sector stocks. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB): China-based internet companies listed overseas.

Updated October 28, 2026

Where CQQQ and KWEB trade against their own history

CQQQ trades at 15.5 times earnings, against its own median of 22.7, and is cheaper than 99% of its own last 9 years.

KWEB trades at 11.9 times earnings, against its own median of 20.2, and is cheaper than 99% of its own last 9 years.

What moved CQQQ and KWEB this week

CQQQ fell 3.2% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Meituan Dianping (−4.7%), Pinduoduo (−1.6%) and Tencent (−1.5%); Sunny Optical Tech (+6.8%) pushed the other way.

KWEB fell 3.2% in the week to October 28, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Netease (−9.4%), Alibaba (−4.6%) and Lenovo (−8.5%); Knowledge Atlas Technology JSC (+15.3%) pushed the other way.

What do CQQQ and KWEB each hold?

What's inside CQQQ: Tech 41%, Semiconductors 13%.

53% of CQQQ is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside KWEB: Tech 26%, Memory 2%.

61% of KWEB is its ten largest holdings.

How much do CQQQ and KWEB overlap? 39.9% by weight

As of October 28, 2026, CQQQ and KWEB overlap 39.9% by weight.

54% of CQQQ is already inside KWEB.

44% of KWEB is already inside CQQQ.

CQQQ holds 218 companies and KWEB holds 45; 18 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score CQQQ and KWEB? 3.2 and 3.6 out of 10

As of October 28, 2026, ETF Copilot scores CQQQ 3.2 out of 10 and KWEB 3.6 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: CQQQ 5.3 and KWEB 7.0.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

CQQQ vs KWEB — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorCQQQKWEB
Growth5.37.0
Value9.99.8
Risk0.30.4
Quality0.91.0
Return0.30.1

CQQQ is the cheaper of the two at 0.65% a year

As of October 28, 2026, CQQQ charges 0.65% a year, yields 2.84% and holds $1.9B in assets across 218 positions.

As of October 28, 2026, KWEB charges 0.69% a year, yields 9.13% and holds $4.3B in assets across 45 positions.

CQQQ vs KWEB — cost, income and size
MeasureCQQQKWEB
Expense ratio0.65%0.69%
Dividend yield2.84%9.13%
Assets under management$1.9B$4.3B
Holdings21845

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “CQQQ vs KWEB holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 28, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/cqqq-vs-kweb

  1. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ)
  2. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks CQQQ vs KWEB prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →