CQQQ vs KWEB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of September 11, 2026, CQQQ and KWEB overlap 41.4% by weight. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ): Chinese technology sector stocks. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB): Owns a focused strategy.

Updated September 11, 2026

How much do CQQQ and KWEB overlap?

As of September 11, 2026, CQQQ and KWEB overlap 41.4% by weight.

52% of CQQQ is already inside KWEB.

47% of KWEB is already inside CQQQ.

CQQQ holds 180 companies and KWEB holds 44; 18 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score CQQQ and KWEB?

As of September 11, 2026, ETF Copilot scores CQQQ 4.6 out of 10 and KWEB 4.2 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: CQQQ 9.7 and KWEB 7.1.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

CQQQ vs KWEB — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
Factor	CQQQ	KWEB
Growth	9.7	7.1
Valuation	9.8	9.8
Risk	0.6	0.5
Quality	2.3	3.9
Return	0.4	0.1

CQQQ is the cheaper of the two at 0.65% a year

As of September 11, 2026, CQQQ charges 0.65% a year, yields 0.56% and holds $3.0B in assets across 180 positions.

As of September 11, 2026, KWEB charges 0.69% a year, yields 1.19% and holds $4.8B in assets across 44 positions.

CQQQ vs KWEB — cost, income and size
Measure	CQQQ	KWEB
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.69%
Dividend yield	0.56%	1.19%
Assets under management	$3.0B	$4.8B
Holdings	180	44

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Where CQQQ and KWEB trade against their own history

CQQQ trades at 17.7 times earnings, against its own median of 23.0, and is cheaper than 94% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

KWEB trades at 11.7 times earnings, against its own median of 20.1, and is cheaper than 95% of its own 114 monthly readings since 2017.

What moved CQQQ and KWEB this week

CQQQ fell 3.6% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Pinduoduo (−4.7%), Meituan Dianping (−3.3%) and HUA Hong Semi (−6.8%); Shennan Circuits (+16.3%) pushed the other way.

KWEB fell 3.7% in the week to September 11, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Pinduoduo (−4.7%), Alibaba (−3.1%) and Meituan Dianping (−3.3%); China Ruyi (+20.3%) pushed the other way.

What do CQQQ and KWEB each hold?

What's inside CQQQ: Tech 42%, Semiconductors 12%.

53% of CQQQ is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside KWEB: Tech 27%, Memory 3%.

61% of KWEB is its ten largest holdings.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “CQQQ vs KWEB holdings overlap and scores”, as of September 11, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/cqqq-vs-kweb