ETF Copilot

BBH vs JHML: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, BBH and JHML overlap 1.8% by weight. VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH): U.S. biotech companies. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML): U.S. large-cap stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where BBH and JHML trade against their own history

BBH trades at 27.9 times earnings, against its own median of 23.3, and is more expensive than 77% of its own last 9 years.

JHML trades at 22.7 times earnings, against its own median of 20.9, and is more expensive than 63% of its own last 9 years.

What moved BBH and JHML this week

BBH rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Moderna (+18.4%), Gilead Sciences (+4.4%) and Amgen (+2.9%); Argenx SE (−10.2%) pushed the other way.

JHML rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Amazon.com (+4.3%), Microsoft (+3.4%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

What do BBH and JHML each hold?

What's inside BBH: AI 3%.

73% of BBH is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside JHML: Tech 34%, Magnificent 7 21%.

25% of JHML is its ten largest holdings.

How much do BBH and JHML overlap? 1.8% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, BBH and JHML overlap 1.8% by weight.

91% of BBH is already inside JHML.

2% of JHML is already inside BBH.

BBH holds 25 companies and JHML holds 775; 21 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score BBH and JHML? 3.9 and 6.3 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores BBH 3.9 out of 10 and JHML 6.3 out of 10.

They differ most on Quality: BBH 1.3 and JHML 7.2.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

BBH vs JHML — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorBBHJHML
Growth8.86.2
Value1.03.4
Risk3.07.5
Quality1.37.2
Return3.37.1

JHML is the cheaper of the two at 0.29% a year

As of October 9, 2026, BBH charges 0.35% a year, yields 0.40% and holds $472M in assets across 25 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, JHML charges 0.29% a year, yields 0.93% and holds $1.2B in assets across 775 positions.

BBH vs JHML — cost, income and size
MeasureBBHJHML
Expense ratio0.35%0.29%
Dividend yield0.40%0.93%
Assets under management$472M$1.2B
Holdings25775

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “BBH vs JHML holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/bbh-vs-jhml

  1. VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH)
  2. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks BBH vs JHML prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →