BAMV vs JHML: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, BAMV and JHML overlap 17.9% by weight. Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV): Value-oriented US stocks John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML): U.S. large-cap stocks.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where BAMV and JHML trade against their own history
BAMV trades at 16.4 times earnings, against its own median of 19.2, and is cheaper than 92% of its own 38 monthly readings since 2023.
JHML trades at 22.7 times earnings, against its own median of 20.9, and is more expensive than 63% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved BAMV and JHML this week
BAMV rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Cisco Systems (+5.5%) and Walt Disney (+5.7%); Verizon Communications (−9.3%) pushed the other way.
JHML rose 1.2% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Amazon.com (+4.3%), Microsoft (+3.4%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.
What do BAMV and JHML each hold?
What's inside BAMV: Tech 24%, Magnificent 7 10%.
39% of BAMV is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside JHML: Tech 34%, Magnificent 7 21%.
25% of JHML is its ten largest holdings.
How much do BAMV and JHML overlap? 17.9% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, BAMV and JHML overlap 17.9% by weight.
100% of BAMV is already inside JHML.
18% of JHML is already inside BAMV.
BAMV holds 99 companies and JHML holds 775; 99 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score BAMV and JHML? 6.2 and 6.3 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores BAMV 6.2 out of 10 and JHML 6.3 out of 10.
They differ most on Value: BAMV 9.0 and JHML 3.4.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | BAMV | JHML |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3 | 6.2 |
| Value | 9.0 | 3.4 |
| Risk | 9.5 | 7.5 |
| Quality | 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Return | 3.6 | 7.1 |
JHML is the cheaper of the two at 0.29% a year
As of October 9, 2026, BAMV charges 0.95% a year, yields 1.27% and holds $122M in assets across 99 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, JHML charges 0.29% a year, yields 0.93% and holds $1.2B in assets across 775 positions.
| Measure | BAMV | JHML |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.29% |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.93% |
| Assets under management | $122M | $1.2B |
| Holdings | 99 | 775 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “BAMV vs JHML holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/bamv-vs-jhml
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks BAMV vs JHML prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →