AUSF vs FNDB: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores
As of October 9, 2026, AUSF and FNDB overlap 25.2% by weight. Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF): U.S. multi-factor stocks. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB): U.S. companies by fundamentals.
Updated October 9, 2026
Where AUSF and FNDB trade against their own history
AUSF trades at 14.9 times earnings, against its own median of 15.4, and is cheaper than 62% of its own 99 monthly readings since 2018.
FNDB trades at 19.1 times earnings, against its own median of 17.5, and is more expensive than 66% of its own 115 monthly readings since 2017.
What moved AUSF and FNDB this week
AUSF rose 0.6% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were CME (+6.6%), Walmart (+6.8%) and Cisco Systems (+5.5%); Verizon Communications (−9.3%) pushed the other way.
FNDB rose 1.3% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Moderna (+18.4%) and Amazon.com (+4.3%); Intel (−12.3%) pushed the other way.
What do AUSF and FNDB each hold?
What's inside AUSF: Tech 16%, Magnificent 7 4%.
17% of AUSF is its ten largest holdings.
What's inside FNDB: Tech 22%, Magnificent 7 15%.
21% of FNDB is its ten largest holdings.
How much do AUSF and FNDB overlap? 25.2% by weight
As of October 9, 2026, AUSF and FNDB overlap 25.2% by weight.
99% of AUSF is already inside FNDB.
36% of FNDB is already inside AUSF.
AUSF holds 189 companies and FNDB holds 1,618; 186 are in both.
Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.
How does ETF Copilot score AUSF and FNDB? 5.2 and 5.6 out of 10
As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores AUSF 5.2 out of 10 and FNDB 5.6 out of 10.
They differ most on Value: AUSF 7.6 and FNDB 3.9.
The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.
| Factor | AUSF | FNDB |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.9 | 2.9 |
| Value | 7.6 | 3.9 |
| Risk | 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Quality | 3.8 | 4.9 |
| Return | 6.0 | 7.8 |
FNDB is the cheaper of the two at 0.25% a year
As of October 9, 2026, AUSF charges 0.27% a year, yields 2.79% and holds $872M in assets across 189 positions.
As of October 9, 2026, FNDB charges 0.25% a year, yields 1.46% and holds $1.5B in assets across 1618 positions.
| Measure | AUSF | FNDB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.27% | 0.25% |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 1.46% |
| Assets under management | $872M | $1.5B |
| Holdings | 189 | 1618 |
Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.
Cite this
ETF Copilot, “AUSF vs FNDB holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/ausf-vs-fndb
ETF Copilot Pro unlocks AUSF vs FNDB prices and holdings.
Try Pro free →