ETF Copilot

ACWI vs QUS: holdings overlap, shared companies and scores

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and QUS overlap 49.2% by weight. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI): Large and mid-cap stocks worldwide. State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS): U.S. multi-factor stocks.

Updated October 9, 2026

Where ACWI and QUS trade against their own history

ACWI trades at 21.0 times earnings, against its own median of 18.9, and is more expensive than 66% of its own last 9 years.

QUS trades at 23.3 times earnings, against its own median of 21.4, and is more expensive than 70% of its own last 9 years.

What moved ACWI and QUS this week

ACWI rose 0.5% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Microsoft (+3.4%), Amazon.com (+4.3%) and Alphabet (+2.4%); Nvidia (−2.0%) pushed the other way.

QUS rose 1.8% in the week to October 9, 2026. The holdings that moved it most were Visa (+6.9%), Microsoft (+3.4%) and Palantir Technologies (+10.8%); Lam Research (−8.2%) pushed the other way.

What do ACWI and QUS each hold?

What's inside ACWI: Tech 38%, Magnificent 7 22%.

26% of ACWI is its ten largest holdings.

What's inside QUS: Tech 33%, Magnificent 7 16%.

23% of QUS is its ten largest holdings.

How much do ACWI and QUS overlap? 49.2% by weight

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI and QUS overlap 49.2% by weight.

64% of ACWI is already inside QUS.

100% of QUS is already inside ACWI.

ACWI holds 2,214 companies and QUS holds 514; 511 are in both.

Computed by ETF Copilot from both funds' holdings rather than quoted from a data provider, and rebuilt nightly.

How does ETF Copilot score ACWI and QUS? 6.4 and 6.1 out of 10

As of October 9, 2026, ETF Copilot scores ACWI 6.4 out of 10 and QUS 6.1 out of 10.

They differ most on Growth: ACWI 7.5 and QUS 4.9.

The five factor scores behind them are set out below, 0–10 and higher is better, ranked against every US equity ETF we track.

ACWI vs QUS — ETF Copilot factor scores, 0–10
FactorACWIQUS
Growth7.54.9
Value2.42.5
Risk6.88.7
Quality7.68.1
Return6.96.7

QUS is the cheaper of the two at 0.15% a year

As of October 9, 2026, ACWI charges 0.32% a year, yields 1.40% and holds $33.3B in assets across 2214 positions.

As of October 9, 2026, QUS charges 0.15% a year, yields 1.25% and holds $1.6B in assets across 514 positions.

ACWI vs QUS — cost, income and size
MeasureACWIQUS
Expense ratio0.32%0.15%
Dividend yield1.40%1.25%
Assets under management$33.3B$1.6B
Holdings2214514

Expense ratio, dividend yield and assets under management are reported by the fund and refreshed daily. Every other figure on this page is computed by ETF Copilot.

Compare with similar funds

Cite this

ETF Copilot, “ACWI vs QUS holdings overlap and scores”, as of October 9, 2026.
https://etf-copilot.com/compare/acwi-vs-qus

  1. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI)
  2. State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS)

ETF Copilot Pro unlocks ACWI vs QUS prices and holdings.

Try Pro free →